-
-
by SaxMan (559 posts)
20 years ago
Re: Selmer Reference 54 vs. Selmer III (alto)
We sell A LOT more series III's than references, the tone is bigger, tuning better, it isnt as ugly, it isnt as expensive, it plays better and is more comfortable.
-
by johnsonfromwisconsin (767 posts)
20 years ago
Re: Selmer Reference 54 vs. Selmer III (alto)
I thought you were most impressed with the Ref Alto before?
-
by chiamac (586 posts)
20 years ago
Re: Selmer Reference 54 vs. Selmer III (alto)
[I thought you were most impressed with the Ref Alto before?]
I don't remeber, but I'm still not impressed with him. So it really dosn't matter.
=)
-
by sax_maniac (984 posts)
20 years ago
Re: Selmer Reference 54 vs. Selmer III (alto)
My III is up for sale - not on account of coming across the Ref, by the way. I absolutely love my III - it's just that it's replaceable and the cash would come in handy right now. Guess that's the one thing about a modern issue. You can always get another one - at least they're easier to replace. It's not like trying to replace an SBA that's worth crying over...
And who knows. Maybe my next kick-ass alto will be a Yamaha or Yani. There's a mint early 80's YAS-23 I can choose to obtain at any moment. That would be very Zen to find peace in a YAS-23, wouldn't it?
-
by SaxMan (559 posts)
20 years ago
Re: Selmer Reference 54 vs. Selmer III (alto)
Oh alto...right.
Well we still havent sold the ref we have yet, but its a really nice horn. I wouldnt pick it over a III, but im a classical player. I would like to have one soem day though.
-
by sax_maniac (984 posts)
20 years ago
Selmer Reference 54 vs. "vintage" YAS-23 (alto)
Ok. Check me into the looney bin, call a doctor, call a priest...
I set up and tweaked the YAS-23 this weekend. Practiced a bit and used it at church yesterday.
I'm going to make this 23 my main horn and sell the Selmer III.
I played a new 23 in a local shop last year and didn't like the way it felt or sounded at all. I was embarassed for Yamaha. This old one I've got is a different animal.
Don't know if it's the 'ol "dont make 'em like they used to" thing or what. Maybe it's the one really large key guard that covers all the bell keys. You can fit a bumper sticker on that thing!
I've got awesome pictures if anyone wants to see the 23. They were done by a professional photographer. I've also got pictures of my III now.
Yeah - the III is incredible and all, but for what I do musically, it's like using a Ferarri to deliver pizzas. I think that the III made me sound better than I really was (if that makes any sense) and it helped me get back into the habit of playing more often. Now that I'm back into the swing of things, All I really need is my tried and true mouthpieces and a well set-up horn to make me happy, apparently.
-
by johnsonfromwisconsin (767 posts)
20 years ago
Re: Selmer Reference 54 vs. Selmer III (alto)
------------------------------------------------------
Oh alto...right.
------------------------------------------------------
You were talking about Tenors initially? Here I would have to agree. Selmer's so called Mark VI copy was among the least favorite tenor's I've played. The funny thing is, wasn't the SA 80 a Mk VI copy, and the series II, as well? To say nothing of the overtures I've heard about the Series III being a copy of the vaunted mark VI, and what about the early Yanagisawas and the YAS-62? Weren't they heralded by their makers as Mk VI copies?
The Mark VI is an advertising boogieman, and I'm not sure they really ever existed.
:D
-
by SaxMan (559 posts)
20 years ago
Re: Selmer Reference 54 vs. Selmer III (alto)
Yeah, i was messed up. I wouldnt know if the SA 80 was a copy or not, I just heard it kind of sucked. I am sure the II and III IS NOT a copy, because neither play anything remotely like the VI other than the selmer core sound. Maybe they were designed to look similair to it...like the key guards, but other than that, I cant find a similarity between the II, III and the VI. The 62 was a joke, and overly bright monstrosity that has a life of about 25 years unless you take precarious care of it. The yanagisawas actually resembled the VI in some fashion.
-
by sax_maniac (984 posts)
20 years ago
Re: Selmer Reference 54 vs. Selmer III (alto)
Due to the variation on Mark VI's, it's holy grail reputation is a testament to it's marketing moreso than it's manufacture.
And now there's horns that claim to be Yani copies, so where does it all end?
Let me offer some further rhetorical questions - (that means don't bother answering them if you are a "know-it-all').
Was the Mark VI design based on the SBA or was it delivered by the aliens that brought us the pyramids? What modern horn will be admired 50 years from now? Will a Selmer III sell for $35,000 in 2050? What modern horns do non-endorsing professionals prefer?
Some people take pride in their '58 Chevy. I'd rather be driving a Z06.
-
by golferguy675 (600 posts)
20 years ago
Re: Selmer Reference 54 vs. Selmer III (alto)
Not to turnt his into a Chevy thread...but the Z06s are over rated. The 70's stingray styles and the 60's hatchbacks are way better.
-
by SaxMan (559 posts)
20 years ago
Re: Selmer Reference 54 vs. Selmer III (alto)
Damn right golfer. those new pieces of junk are unbecoming of domestic engineering.
-
by sax_maniac (984 posts)
20 years ago
Re: Selmer Reference 54 vs. Selmer III (alto)
While the Stingray styling will always be my favorite (it's the hips, man. the HIPS!) , you can't possibly say that the old Vettes are a better car overall - unless you don't care about performance, ride, handling, etc.
Hmmmm... a parallel with regard to saxophones, perhaps??? "They don't make 'em like they used to." (Thank God)...
And SaxMan, I'll be sure to pass along your objective review to the Chief Engineer. Maybe your inspiring comments about his award winning "pieces of junk" will drive him to make the next C even greater. But I'm guessing you've driven neither and are once again rectally extracting your opinion.
-
by SaxMan (559 posts)
20 years ago
Re: Selmer Reference 54 vs. Selmer III (alto)
those new monstrosities turn out 450. the ZL1 does 6-700. actually I have driven both, the 73 was a friends that I drove down the street - didnt know how to shift then - it had rubber in all 4 gears. I drove a 2000 piece of junk - that was at a dealership - a friend of mines dad owned it, it wasnt anything compared to the 73.
heck, an ls6 puts out 450, you could EASILY push that to 2000, I would be surprised if you could press a modern corvet to 1200.
please do, maybe they will start to fix them - theyve slightly fixed the camero, but they have a long way to go.
-
by sax_maniac (984 posts)
20 years ago
Re: Selmer Reference 54 vs. Selmer III (alto)
Don't forget to turn off the traction control. That's what I love about my SRX - a minivan that can smoke the tires and pull over .8g
"They've slightly fixed the Camaro?"
Too bad - they haven't been in production for a couple years now. The GTO from Holden should make RWD folks happy, though it's not much to look at.
Oh.
Sorry.
Saxophones....
Kind of a "driver's car" similar to a "player's horn"
-
by golferguy675 (600 posts)
20 years ago
Re: Selmer Reference 54 vs. Selmer III (alto)
Yup, Camaros, Firebirds, and Trans Ams have been out of production since 2002.....cryin shame
Rectally Extracting???
Never heard it put it quite that before... @_@
-
by SaxMan (559 posts)
20 years ago
Re: Selmer Reference 54 vs. Selmer III (alto)
similair? not really.
|