Manufacturer: | VIKING INSTRUMENTS |
---|---|
Model: | ACOUSTIC BALANCE M40 |
By: Viking Instruments See all of this user's reviews on Jul 15, 2012
"...this horn (Acoustic Balance M40) really comes to life - vibrating nicely in my hands, but doing the delicate ballad thing exceptionally well, too." - JohnnyC, SOTW Member
By: William Bua See all of this user's reviews on May 24, 2012
I ordered a Viking M-40 because I play and like Taiwanese horns myself. I also wanted to try it out because of Viking's claims of a less heavy horn. As a 49 year old, I have neck issues from having a tenor on my neckstrap since I was 12. God knows a couple less pounds adds up after a 4 hour gig.
When the saxophone arrived, I noticed it was in a box much smaller that what I use to ship tenors. I not only play them, I repair them and flip saxophones as well. As a flipper/repairman, I see and play literally hundreds of horns in a year from student horns to the best SBA's Anyway, I opened the box and to my horror, there was very little padding in the box. The case was moving freely inside the box and that ain't good. I expected there to be damage to the horn quite frankly. There was no visable damage. Viking uses a very good Selmer flight case knock off that did the job protecting the horn during shipping, but I don't depend on cases myself.
I was struck by the looks of the horn. The fit and finish is exactly what it should be on the body of the horn. The soldered mini ribs showed no faulty workmanship or sloppy finishing. The dark lacquer is not nearly as dark as the competitors horns tend to be. I put a light down the horn to give it a quick check and put my RPC 115B on the neck and gave it a good thrashing. I noticed immediately that the resistance was very great. I was expecting a freer blowing horn. The M-40 had far more resistance than any Ba or SBA I have ever played. I put the light back down the horn to see if I missed anything. Then I noticed that the neck was a few shades darker than the body of the horn.
I informed Viking about the playability problems and to his credit Rich sent me two different necks to try out. One was marked Viking and the other was a Balanced Action neck that had been worked on by Randy Jones. The viking neck didn't make a lick of difference, but the BA neck was much better but too bright for some reason. I play a Taiwanese horn with the same neck tenon size, so I tried my two necks out and one of them really made the M-40 play better. Nevertheless, I sent the horn back to Viking.
It took Viking 8 days for the refund to post after they got their horn back.
I do want to point out the the Viking M-40 is a well built horn, at least the body is. The case is great and I think with a little bit more R&D to find the right neck, it will be an absolute winner. I say this dispite my experiences with Viking.
By: Viking Instruments See all of this user's reviews on Jan 26, 2012